Involved in a construction-defects dispute?
Need an expert engineer's opinion for legal proceedings?
Does the court require an admissible engineering opinion?
In legal proceedings on an engineering matter, the expert's opinion is the central means of proof. It translates a complex engineering reality into clear findings the court can rely on.
At B.R.N. Engineering we produce professional, objective engineering opinions that are admissible in court, backed by an on-site inspection and the experience of an engineer who can also stand behind his findings under cross-examination.
An engineering opinion is a professional document written by an expert engineer, presenting findings, engineering analysis and conclusions about the condition of a structure or the source of a defect. In legal proceedings it is the central means of proof: it translates a complex engineering reality into clear, reasoned language the court can rely on.
For the opinion to be accepted as evidence it must be objective, based on a thorough engineering inspection and compliant with the requirements of the law. That is why it is important that it be written by a licensed, experienced engineer who can both substantiate his findings on site and stand behind them under cross-examination in the courtroom.
Claims against a contractor or developer over cracks, moisture, settlement, poor finishing and structural failures.
Assessing the loss in the property's value due to a construction defect, adjacent construction or infrastructure works.
Locating the source of the damage, determining liability and estimating the repair cost for the legal proceedings.
An opinion on a dangerous building, structural cracks, collapse or concern for the stability of the frame.
Disputes over shared walls, building violations, vibrations and excavations that caused engineering damage.
Quantifying engineering damage for an insurance claim, compensation or proceedings against a third party.
An engineering opinion is accepted as evidence only when it meets the requirements of the law and is drafted in an objective, reasoned manner. The expert’s role is to help the court understand the engineering picture, not to represent a party. These are the components that must appear in an admissible opinion:
In engineering proceedings it is common to rely on two types of experts. It is important to understand the difference in order to choose the right route for you. At B.R.N. Engineering we provide opinions in both roles:
| Aspect | Court-appointed expert | Party-appointed expert |
|---|---|---|
| Who appoints | Appointed by the court as a neutral party. | Hired directly by one of the parties to the proceedings. |
| The role | A single opinion agreed for both parties. | Presents the engineering picture from the perspective of the party that hired them. |
| Cost | Usually split between the parties. | Borne by the party that hired the expert. |
| Evidentiary weight | The court tends to rely on it heavily. | Subject to cross-examination by the opposing party. |
Need an engineering opinion for legal proceedings? Talk to an expert engineer:
Recognition and experience in providing opinions to courts
High reliability and engineering precision
Professional service and full transparency with clients
Expertise across a wide range of engineering fields
For further details or to arrange a meeting, contact us in whatever way is convenient for you:
We are at your service
Private
Private/Commercial
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private/Commercial
Private/Commercial
Private/Commercial
Private/Commercial
Private
Private
Commercial
Commercial
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private/Commercial
Commercial
Private
It is a professional document written by an expert engineer and used as evidence in legal proceedings on an engineering matter. It presents findings, analysis and conclusions about the condition of the structure or the source of the defect, in language the court can rely on.
Mainly in claims over construction defects, diminution in value, water and moisture damage, disputes over the stability and safety of a structure, neighbor and boundary disputes, and insurance or compensation claims involving engineering damage.
A court-appointed expert is appointed by the court as a neutral party and submits a single opinion for both sides. A party-appointed expert is hired by one of the parties and presents the engineering picture from their perspective. We provide opinions in both roles.
The opinion must be objective and reasoned, and include the expert’s details and qualifications, a description of the inspection, findings backed by documentation, engineering analysis, clear conclusions and an expert declaration under the Civil Procedure Regulations.
Yes. In many cases the expert is required to appear, present the opinion and withstand cross-examination. It is important that the opinion be written by an engineer who can substantiate his findings and stand behind them in the courtroom.
An admissible engineering opinion is written by a licensed engineer with expertise and experience in the field relevant to the dispute. The expert’s standing, qualifications and experience directly affect the weight the court will give the opinion.
The preparation time depends on the complexity of the case, the scope of the required inspections and the amount of material to analyze. After the on-site inspection and data collection, we produce an orderly opinion within a reasonable, pre-arranged time frame.
After an initial inquiry we understand the details of the case, carry out an on-site inspection and produce an orderly, admissible opinion. To arrange a meeting with an expert engineer call 03-563-0000 or leave your details and we’ll get back to you.
